One of the most cherished rights we Americans have is the right to voice our opinions on any topic without fear of gov't reprisal. That doesn't happen most anywhere else. Even in England, there are Soapbox Sundays where you can say whatever you want in the public parks --- except anything against the Queen. (Not sure if that is the correct terminology but that is what the guide told us in 2005 when we were in London.)
In America, we can even say our President is a low-down, lying, good-for-nothing, coward --- & then claim those are his good traits. No fear of gov't coming down on us.
Until recently.
Baptists have always been the same way. We treasured dissent & valued the debate because it made us into what we are now. Baptists have evolved greatly in the last 400 years & we are, what we are, because of the dissent of years gone by. We changed. We adjusted. We amended. We evolved.
This is not to say that we changed overnight. Nor is it to say the dissent & the evolution wasn't painful. It was. We fight a lot. Always have. But we agree to put our discussions in the public view because it means a transparency & an opportunity for everyone to come to their own conclusions. You know, priesthood of the believer. We Baptists don't decide our doctrinal distinctives in a back room meeting with a few elites. We don't come to a vote on what we believe & then demand everyone agree with it or leave. Instead, we reach a consensus & invite even those who disagree to continue to cooperate on matters of missions & education.
Until recently.
I'm deeply concerned that what we are seeing today is an entrenchment of the "You're either with us or you're against us." The kind that says, "You're not a Christian nor a patriot if you disagree with us."
And what bothers me the most is that it is on a national & a denominational scale.
When I was college, I had several professors make a rather bold statement. They said the US was more in danger of becoming Fascist than Communistic. They claimed that Fascism uses faith & patriotism to consolidate power. I was young & told them they had lost their mind.
Now, I look around & realize how right they were.
The national scene is almost to the same level of the Red Scare. Don't question any gov't policy because it is "un-American." Disagreement is not patriotic.
On the Baptist level, any dissent is decried as "hurting our evangelism efforts" or "causing trouble in the fellowship." Some honest disagreements on non-essentials have resulted in brothers & sisters being labeled "un-Christian." Even worse, some political disagreements are causing some believers to be called "heretics" if they don't tow the official line of the Baptist leaders.
I now see why we Baptists placed a priority on the idea of soul freedom. It is a foundational principle. I also understand why our Founding Fathers placed such a premium on the ability to dissent, so much so that it is enshrined in the 1st Amendment.
Dissent is a treasure. It is what makes us examine ourselves & our beliefs. It forces us to pour over the Scripture to make sure we can account for the totality of the text. And it is the Word that changes us. Without dissent, we may never have to examine ourselves.
We may disagree. We may fight. We may begin new churches or new denominations. But what we may never do is stifle anyone's right to speak, question or disagree. Once we create rules, laws or policies that effectively tell people to be quite, we are indeed taking that 1st step of Fascism.
When we meld faith & politics, both become unbearable.
2 comments:
We do seem to be moving away from the freedoms that this country was founded on. The best example of this is when an organization obtains 501(3)(c) status as a non-profit organization. One of the conditions of this designation is that the organization cannot criticize or publicly oppose the government or its policies. I think it was Larry Burkett on his radio show that said this was why churches should never seek to become a 501(3)(c) organization. Tax laws automatically make churches exempt anyway, and this status would take away the freedom of expression of the pastor. I think this is illegal as the First Amendment clearly states that Congress shall make no laws abridging the freedom of speech. It looks like its being abridged to me. I haven't researched this out, but I heard recently that the law concerning non-profit organizations has been modified so that someone criticizing the government or its policies could conceivably be charged with a hate crime. I haven't seen the documentation, but wouldn't surprise me.
Dirk
http://journals.aol.com/tsalagiman1/the-first-amendment-not-politi/
Thanks for checkin in
Take a look at the post I just put up on the black primary in South Carolina.
yeah, we can talk. Hope you make it to the Atlanta covenant.
I guess from Wellford, you know of Lemons, and Miller
Post a Comment